” Hill’s misidentification cannot be passed off as a simple mistake.” If it wasn’t a mistake your implication is that he found .38 Auto shells-what other point could you be making? A central position of Conspiracy viewpoints appears to be that nobody ever makes a mistake-every statement at odds with the facts must be a conscious effort to deceive or cover ? Is it because that unlike every other event in human history every statement in the JFK assassination is infallible and must be taken as absolute truth ( except of course any statement supporting the WC conclusions)?
I understand that feel that the shells would not be admissible. But what would a judge in 1963 Dallas rule? What would a judge in 2016 California who presides over criminal trials rule? As an attorney with a dog in this case you would obviously like to restrict any evidence that would tend to convict your client, but how about some objective evidence to back up that claim?
Most of all, we are proud of our dedicated team, who has both the creativity and understanding of our clients' needs. Our writers always follow your instructions and bring fresh ideas to the table, which remains a huge part of success in writing an essay. We guarantee the authenticity of your paper, whether it's an essay or a dissertation. Furthermore, we ensure confidentiality of your personal information, so the chance that someone will find out about our cooperation is slim to none. We do not share any of your information to anyone.