First of all, all those 3 schools are excellent choices for Biomaterials. If you want to work on Biomaterials, UT Dallas would be a great choice. UT Arlington is also good choice, but the program is slightly inclined towards engineering. So, it’s up to you. But, UT Arlington has got great funding (which might be problem at Dallas in bagging a Scholarship) and the program is quite inter-disciplinary. SUNY Buffalo might be the best option according to me. But, you should check the profile and project/research pages of the faculty members of those three schools and then decide.
Previously, Ignacio worked for 11 years at Dresdner Kleinwort doing origination for DCM, ECM and Equity Derivatives in the Financial Institutions Group for Spain and Portugal. Ignacio worked for all the main banks in Spain and Portugal with leading roles in senior funding secured and unsecured, hybrid capital and ABS transactions including Santander, BBVA, la Caixa, Caja Madrid, Banesto, Banco Popular, Banco Sabadell and Caixa Geral de Depositos among many others. Ignacio was also involved in private placements across different structures and currencies (including 3 AFLAC private placements). Ignacio also worked as global coordinator in equity and equity-linked transactions such as the €275m convertible bond by Jazztel or the Telecinco IPO.
The three areas or jurisdictions selected for comparative study have, collectively, had a very significant impact on the development of company law throughout the world. An understanding of these thus assists students in understanding both the content of, and influences upon, many others. The approach taken is both functional and comparative, looking at a series of core problems with which any system of corporate law must deal, and analysing, from a functional perspective, the solutions adopted by the systems in question. The course seeks to situate these solutions in the underlying concepts and assumptions of the chosen systems, as these often provide an explanation for divergences. To this end, the course begins with a contextual overview of ‘systems’ of corporate governance, which material is then applied in the following seminars on more substantive topics. Such a comparative study is intended to enable students to see their own system of company law in a new and more meaningful light, and to be able to form new views about its future development. Finally, a study of the ways in which the European Union is developing company law within its boundaries is also important, not only as illustrating, by a review of the harmonisation programme, the benefits to be derived from a comparative study in practice, but also because it shows new ways in which corporate vehicles can be developed to meet particular policy objectives.